István Apáti asked the government about the fate of the 150 billion state assets and the bill.

István Apáti criticized the expedited parliamentary approval of a bill, attributing it to pressure from interest groups. He questioned the MBH Bank's handling of retail accounts based on personal experiences. Apáti proposed that any decisions allowing foreign influence over state assets require a supermajority in parliament. He demanded clarification from the finance minister regarding the government's long-term intentions for the approximately 140-150 billion HUF assets and related bonds transferring to the Hungarian National Asset Management Inc. after the closure of the integration organization.