The Constitutional judges who were in favor of admitting the appeal regarding the 'grandchildren's law' find the majority's conclusion "intolerable".

Two dissenting judges from Spain's Constitutional Court criticized the majority's decision to reject a case regarding the suspension of voting rights for 160,000 citizens. They argued that the majority relied on a formalistic approach, avoiding a significant constitutional debate. The judges emphasized the importance of addressing the fundamental right to vote, especially given the unprecedented nature of the judicial suspension affecting so many citizens. They contended that the case warranted a thorough examination of the procedural requirements for constitutional protection, rather than dismissing it as premature due to ongoing Supreme Court proceedings. This situation, they believe, represents a pivotal moment in the court's history.