The Constitutional Court did not intervene in Bence Tuzson's trick.

Tuzson Bence, former justice minister, sought clarification from Hungary's Constitutional Court regarding the execution of a ruling that could conflict with constitutional obligations. The European Court of Justice ruled against certain provisions of Hungary's controversial child protection law, which limited the representation of homosexuality. Despite the previous government's refusal to implement the ruling, the new government did not withdraw the inquiry. The Constitutional Court rejected the inquiry without substantive examination, citing a lack of evidence that the former minister acted on behalf of the government. Only one judge dissented, arguing that the constitutional questions raised remain relevant and criticizing the political framing of the inquiry.

Fact-check this story: paste the text or link into Justifact and get a verdict with the sources consulted.