The Constitutional Court ruled that the Curia classified graffiti causing minor damage as a crime.

The Constitutional Court annulled a 2022 ruling by the Curia that classified graffiti as a crime regardless of its content. The ruling, initiated by former Prosecutor General Péter Polt, stated that freedom of expression does not justify damaging others' property. The Curia's interpretation limited judges' discretion, as graffiti often reflects public opinion. The Constitutional Court found this interpretation contrary to its practice, emphasizing that the content of graffiti can be relevant in determining whether it falls under protected freedom of expression. The annulment means the Curia's ruling is no longer applicable. Three judges expressed dissenting opinions, highlighting concerns about the implications for property rights and the potential for misunderstanding the relationship between expression and property damage.