The Supreme Court College condemns changes in the Constitutional Tribunal. Expert: It's just an opinion

The Supreme Court's General Assembly was scheduled to discuss constitutional threats but failed to convene due to lack of quorum. 28 judges announced they would not attend, citing procedural violations in the assembly's organization. Only 55 out of 94 judges showed up, falling short of the required two-thirds majority. Meanwhile, the Supreme Court's College adopted a resolution regarding the Constitutional Tribunal, stating that attempts to remove its president lacked legal basis. A judge emphasized that the College's resolutions do not affect the Tribunal's operations, as the Supreme Court has no authority over it.

Fact-check this story: paste the text or link into Justifact and get a verdict with the sources consulted.