They still found a point violating the Fundamental Law in the regulation of the home care allowance for children

The Constitutional Court annulled parts of the social law regarding the home care allowance for children, citing unjustified discrimination among families in need. This decision arose from a case involving a grandmother caring for her severely injured grandchild after the parents' tragic death. The court criticized the law for creating disparities based on when the eligibility for the allowance was established, arguing that it unfairly penalizes caregivers who are already receiving pensions. The majority of the court agreed that the law violates the Fundamental Law by treating similar situations differently without reasonable justification. The ruling was not unanimous, with some judges expressing differing opinions.