NVVH: Seszták Miklós remains in custody not due to the signal of the search dog

The extension of Miklós Seszták's detention is justified by the risk of evidence being compromised, not solely by the dog’s alert. His lawyer argues that the canine's indication does not constitute evidence, but the National Asset Recovery and Protection Office asserts otherwise. The investigation focuses on Seszták's activities during his ministerial term from June 2014 to May 2018, with allegations of corruption and bribery. Other individuals involved in the case have already been detained, and the prosecution claims there is sufficient evidence to support the charges against Seszták.